« Customize your PC ... with care | Main | The OTHER blog »
May 26, 2005
That's (possibly not) entertainment
Just how dangerous is Richard Stubbs' brand of radio? According to Gay Alcorn's opinion piece in The Age today, Radio 774's afternoon announcer - who we all know was recruited from the faraway land of commercial radio - is so lethally boring he could be presenting the ABC's opponents with a perfect excuse to stop funding the national broadcaster.
Gay was understandably upset, having sat through one program where Stubbsy fascinated the audience by reflecting on how good it was to find himself still on the B list of personalities, then invited listeners to become enthralled with sharing their hints for pampering themselves, before encouraging them to ring up and tell all their fellow listeners how they got themselves stuck in strange places. Not only was this particularly announcer frivolous and dull, according to Gay, he was possibly contagious.
Jon Faine, she suggests, has become suspiciously fluffy recently, to the extent that last week he unleashed his investigative skills on council policies on the length of dog leads. (Bleeding Edge possibly shouldn't admit this, but we probably would have been quite interested in learning about dog lead regulations.)
Had Gay listened this afternoon, she probably would have been beside herself. Stubbsy was at it again, getting callers to ring up and chat about the pet names people deployed with their loved ones.
Let's see now: one chap complained that his wife used the same four terms in a completely undiscriminatory fashion (about which Stubbsy observed that terms like "love" and "darl" were "default settings", which we thought was quite a clever line), a young woman revealed that although she loved the name "Chief" which her boyfriend gave her, she was no longer playing cowboys and indians with him, and a Welsh chap explained that the fact that he was called "Johnny Grownomore" was a practical necessity, given that (a) his family were height-challenged, and (b) the fact that every second Welshman is called Jones, or Williams, means they have to have some way, aside from surnames and Christian names, of identifying themselves.
What's fascinating to Bleeding Edge is that the people who call in clearly can't regard this stuff as . For all we know, it's the . And given that they're paying their few cents a day to run the ABC, just like everybody else, shouldn't they be entitled to have their dull and frivolous needs met?
After all, isn't the current ABC promotional line something like "Everyone's ABC"?
The fact is, of course, the ABC has never been everyone's ABC. It's been the exclusive preserve of the more patrician levels of our society. Ironically, an awful lot of Liberal voters wouldn't listen to anything else.
And if there has been a dumbing down of ABC content, it's not been confined to local radio. How did the householders of Toorak and Brighton react, we wonder, to the fact that the ABC TV news recently led its nightly bulletin on the Kylie Minogue breast cancer story?
Perhaps our brain has become addled by the occasional exposure to this sort of stuff, but we're starting to speculate on the possibility that the appearance of Richard Stubbs is in fact part of some devious plot to piss Liberal voters off to the point where they start to demand that the Treasurer and Prime Minister do something to address the decline in ABC funding. Stubbs is probably in on the conspiracy.
Posted by cw at May 26, 2005 02:13 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://bleedingedge.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/702
Comments
Candidly, I don't think Gay wouldn't know her arse from her elbow. If one refers to the dictionary, the definition of boring is Lyn Haultain. But then Gay might like listening to how to knit - pearl one, plain one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous at May 26, 2005 04:03 PM
I like stubbie and think the shows fine. No more boring then the 9:45 to 10:30am segment on Thursday Mornings anyway!
Purhaps you should listen to Podcasts. Theres a good one on G'day world. Its the:
“The Charles Wright Special Edition” show. Absolutely great show.
Who is Charles Wright anyway? ;)
Molly
Posted by: Phillip Molly Malone at May 26, 2005 04:35 PM
who's Richard STubbs...?????
Posted by: Ian Smith at May 26, 2005 05:05 PM
Stubbs has potential to fit in and work well at 3LO
if only some one would tell him that the old 80s breakfast crew, you'll know when I'm being funny because I'm talking in a start-stop rhythm, is not really suitable for the midday 3LO audience. Maybe he's been doing that schtick for so long, it's too subconcious for him to even know when he's doing it.
I heard him do straight interviews, where he just spoke normally and he was really good, the right balance of humour and thoughtful comments.
Posted by: pacman at May 27, 2005 10:04 AM
He's miles better than either of the two previous hosts in the spot but does suffer from perhaps being a little more in tune with people below 50, but hey what's wrong with that.
The afternoon show has always been less current affairs based than the morning and drive slots. The ABC is supposed to be for everybody after all. I don't doubt Gay's something of politics and current affairs junkie but there's no point in complaining about a show that isn't aimed at you.
Stubbs is witty, quick and occasionally quite cutting with some of the junk guests on to spruik a product.
Posted by: tflip at May 27, 2005 03:21 PM
I'll admit Richard Stubbs started off a bit too FM rock jockey with a deep voice and inane sneering "i'm cool" tone. But hes improved. His ANZAC stuff with interviews were some of the best ANZAC content on ABC.
Gay Alcorn is the Virginia Trioli type. I can't stand them.
Posted by: Francis Xavier Holden at May 27, 2005 03:44 PM

